![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
|
Compass Business Solutions’ consultants have been
assisting manufacturers and distributors in resolving critical business
challenges for many years.
Our consultants bring creativity and practical experience to each project in order to solve business issues that may not be readily handled by the software. Our unique blend of business process know-how and functional software expertise provide the foundation for this support. In addition to our creativity and experience, we provide training, consulting and project management skills. We have been chosen by many to implement MFG/PRO or improve associated business processes. Our consultants have led or participated in several successful implementations in many versions of the MFG/PRO software. Here are some examples of challenges faced by our clients and the solutions implemented. Challenge:
A customer wanted to
create a standard cost system that would incorporate Labor and Burden
costs in addition to Material. There
were no routings or time standards in place. Challenge:
A manufacturer was not
able to manage variances effectively with the reporting tools and
procedures available.
Challenge:
A manufacturer was
experiencing large unexplained method variances. Challenge:
A Manufacturing company
was moving from a periodic-based inventory system to a standard costing
environment. The company was
unsure as to how to present the Cost of Goods Sold section of the
Financial Statements. CUSTOMER SERVICE/SALES Challenge:
A manufacturer received
planning schedules every week from their top three customers.
These schedules were manually entered as sales orders with multiple
lines and due dates. Each
week, the orders were manually manipulated to update due dates and
quantities. The schedules
were received on Monday and were not completely updated until Wednesday.
This provided two working days of accurate planning information
before the process started again on Monday.
FINANCIAL Challenge:
A manufacturer needed to
capture and view financial reports by Product group.
In addition, they needed flexible budget financial reports. Challenge:
A manufacturing company
did not have solid controls over inventory and the cost of goods sold.
They were unable to reconcile the perpetual record to the General
Ledger and had unexplained manufacturing variances in costs of goods sold. Challenge:
A Manufacturing company
was moving from a periodic-based inventory system to a standard costing
environment. The company was
unsure as to how to present the Cost of Goods Sold section of the
Financial Statements. Challenge:
A Tier 2 Automotive
supplier was having difficulty reconciling their Accounts Payable to an
outside General Ledger each month. GENERAL Challenge:
A customer was up and
running on a modified version of MFG/PRO.
The software had first been implemented many years ago.
There were newer employees that never received formal training on
the software. Most employees
could not differentiate what was custom versus standard in the software. Challenge:
Certain products at a
manufacturing site could be shipped in special packaging or bulk.
The end item part numbers were different for the customer but there
was only a bill of material for the special packaged item.
The bulk sales were packaged and shipped from the original work
center. For packaged sales, the processed materials were moved to another
work center for packaging. It
was difficult to control packaging material inventories and work order
costs. Challenge:
A manufacturer warehoused
raw materials that were considered vendor managed.
The manufacturer was responsible for tracking and monitoring the
material levels. This process
was being handled manually, with no visibility or easy access of
information for the purchasing organization. Challenge:
A
manufacturer stocked raw materials in pounds but purchased in various
container sizes. Units of measure conversions were employed to enhance the
purchasing, receiving and AP processes.
It was critical though, that the manufacturing and stockroom
processes be made aware of the specific container sizes and whether the
inventory was in a full or partial container.
The manufacturer needed the system to be somewhat intelligent
regarding this and have the work order picklist identify the material to
be picked by the number of containers instead of lbs. Challenge:
The receiving process at
a manufacturer that depended on daily deliveries was time consuming and
required visibility of the incoming truckloads in advance.
The advance notice was required to create lot serial labels and
fill out Quality Assurance documentation. MANUFACTURING Challenge:
A large percentage of a
manufacturers raw materials and work-in-process was sent outside for
further processing. The
system that was being used could not track that the work order was at a
supplier and could not allow entry of a Purchase Order to pay for
subcontract services. This resulted in many work arounds and lacked visibility of
subcontract activities. Challenge:
A manufacturing process
often resulted in creation of rework material that could be re-introduced
into the process to manufacturer a different item.
The item could not be inventoried as the original item and there
was no visibility to the manufacturing supervisors that the material was
available. New materials were
often purchased instead of taking advantage of the rework goods.
Challenge:
A manufacturer wanted to
maintain bill of material revision history in the software for service and
support considerations. They
did not have the SSM or PCC modules of the QAD software.
They wanted to be able to access the entire history of an item’s
bill of material, a specific revision, and be able to compare revisions. Challenge:
A manufacturer had one
department where the raw material that was processed could result in
different end products. The
planner never knew what the end product would be until completion of
processing. Most often, the
department had a work order for the wrong end item.
It was difficult to maintain accuracy in the planning and inventory
system. Challenge:
A manufacturer had
multiple sites and wanted to utilize a combined MRP and DRP planning
process but did not want to create and maintain distribution orders
because of the close geographical proximity of the sites.
Solution:
Our consultant designed a
custom DRP transfer tool. This
tool would display the Item numbers and quantities that were available and
needed to transfer between the shipping and receiving sites.
The warehouse personnel to pull and stage material for shipment
used it as a worksheet. It
was used as the receiving document by the receiving warehouse.
Inventory transfer transactions were performed to relocate the
material. Challenge:
A manufacturer did not
have a MRP planning system. Material
procurement could not be initiated until the sales order and all assembly
work order was generated. A
report showing all picklist shortages was then used for procurement.
If the order was for a future time period, the manufacturer still
followed this practice to identify the needs and then deleted all the work
orders. The manufacturer
struggled with on time deliveries and expedites. Solution: Our consultants trained the planning and purchasing organizations on MRP concepts including Forecasting, MRP, DRP Work orders and Inventory controls. Our consultants worked with the groups to pilot the processes in QAD MFG/PRO. After implementation, the manufacturer has daily visibility of requirements for purchasing and manufacturing using a nightly Net Change MRP/DRP combined. This has improves responsiveness, delivery and reduced shortages and expedites. Challenge:
The receiving process at
a manufacturer that depended on daily deliveries was time consuming and
required visibility of the incoming truckloads in advance.
The advance notice was required to create lot serial labels and
fill out Quality Assurance documentation. Solution:
Our consultant reviewed
the current process and identified how it could be done real-time in QAD
MFG/PRO. With the
implementation of MFG/PRO, lot numbers were auto assigned at receipt and a
pop up window during receipt guided the user through label creation.
As the labels were printing and being applied to the product, the
Quality documentation was also printing from MFG/PRO via a custom form.
This change eliminated many hours from the receiving process as
well as improved the accuracy of the labels, inventory and Quality
Assurance data. |
|
|